Article Publication Date:
6/1/2002
Summary:
This report serves as a follow-up to the 1995 Institute on Medicine (IOM) report which argued for an ombudsman program to address the quality of care in long-term institutional settings. This study investigates the role and effectiveness of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs (LTCOPs) in improving care. Surveys with all states/territories reveal new findings on the structure of the program in different states as well as their own perceived effectiveness. Comprehensive data and analysis.
Topics:
Quality
Types/Tools:
Populations:
Aging/Older Adults
Sources:
Institute for Health & Aging
Programs/Initiatives:
Older Americans Act (OAA)
States:
All States/Territories; Alabama; Alaska; Arizona; Arkansas; California; Colorado; Connecticut; Delaware; Florida; Georgia; Hawaii; Illinois; Idaho; District of Columbia; Indiana; Iowa; Kansas; Kentucky; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Michigan; Minnesota; Mississippi; Missouri; Montana; Nebraska; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; New York; North Carolina; North Dakota; Ohio; Oklahoma; Oregon; Pennsylvania; Rhode Island; South Carolina; South Dakota; Tennessee; Texas; Utah; Vermont; Virginia; Washington; West Virginia; Wisconsin; Puerto Rico; Wyoming
Keywords:
Long-Term Care
Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program (LTCOP)
Contact
Institute for Health & Aging UCSF
3333 California St
Suite 340
San Francisco, CA 94118
Phone:
415-502-5200
Short URL: http://www.advancingstates.org/node/53184