Article Publication Date:
8/29/2014
Summary:
In this report, the GAO examined claims, expenditure, and quality data from Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs) during 2009. The GAO notes that D-SNPs with higher levels of Medicare and Medicaid integration performed better on quality outcomes but did not reduce utilization of costly Medicare services. The GAO concludes that CMS projected savings from the Financial Alignment Demonstration and other initiatives to integrate care for dual eligible beneficiaries may be overstated.
Topics:
Medicaid
Types/Tools:
Populations:
Dual Eligibles
Sources:
Kaiser Family Foundation
GAO
Programs/Initiatives:
N/A
States:
Alabama; Alaska; Arizona; Arkansas; California; Colorado; Connecticut; Delaware; District of Columbia; Florida; Georgia; Hawaii; Idaho; Illinois; Indiana; Iowa; Kansas; Kentucky; Louisiana; Maine; Maryland; Massachusetts; Michigan; Minnesota; Mississippi; Missouri; Montana; Nebraska; Nevada; New Hampshire; New Jersey; New Mexico; New York; North Carolina; North Dakota; Ohio; Oklahoma; Oregon; Pennsylvania; Rhode Island; South Carolina; South Dakota; Tennessee; Texas; Utah; Vermont; Virginia; Washington; West Virginia; Wisconsin; Wyoming; All States/Territories
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; dual-eligible special needs plan; fee-for-service; Fully Integrated Dual-Eligible; long-term services and supports; Medicare Advantage; managed care organization; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; special needs plan; Supplemental Security Income; spending; expenditures;
Contact
Government Accountability Office
441 G St., NW
Washington, DC 20548
contact@gao.gov
Phone:
202-512-3000
Short URL: http://www.advancingstates.org/node/65894