State/Agency Information

Forms are provided for designating a representative and screening a representative for Arkansas' IndependentChoices program.

Used for Arkansas IndependentChoices program, these templates are for Participant Summaries and Review Summaries.

Standards required of Arkansas' fiscal management contractor. Includes descriptions of program deliverables and performance indicators.

Titled “Now You Have a Choice in Personal Care”, this tri-fold brochure was designed to be mailed without an envelope. The handout offers a program overview and provides a Request for Additional Information form.

This flowchart depicts the enrollment process for the IndependentChoices program in Arkansas.

Developing HCBS alternatives to institutional care has been a priority for many state Medicaid programs over the last three decades. While the majority of long-term care dollars still go toward institutional care, the national percentage of spending on HCBS has more than doubled from 19 percent in 1995 to 41 percent in 2007. This article presents a summary of the main trends to emerge from the latest (2006) expenditures and participant data for the three main Medicaid HCBS programs.

This document from the Central Texas VDHCBS program contains templates for the veteran's action plan and participant-directed purchases. This worksheet helps develop an action and spending plan.

Community Living Program and Aging & Disability Resource Center grantees, and Veteran Directed Home and Community Based Services programs, evaluators, researchers, and other stakeholders are welcome to answer this call for proposals. Attendance is invitation only, but interested subject matter expert are encouraged to submit sessions and/or recommend a consumer to attend. Deadline is Dec. 15, 2009, “Changing Systems, Changing Lives” will be Feb. 22-24, 2010 in Alexandria, VA.

In FY07 CMS awarded 13 PCP Implementation Grants. The purpose twofold 1) to change the basic model of care planning from one that is directed by the needs of institutions and provider agencies to one that responds to the needs of the individual, and 2) to assist states and territories in developing ways to identify the strengths, capacities, and preferences. This report presents factors that facilitated and/or impeded progress and how stakeholders were included in development and implementation.

This report is the result of a study exploring management techniques and programs States have put in place to rebalance their Medicaid long-term supportive services. It summarizes the methods, products and findings of this project then suggests conclusions and recommendations for State officials, legislators, advocates, and providers and CMS on ways to increase and improve LTSS systems for people with disabilities, enhance participant choice, and reduce reliance on institutions.