Physical Disabilities

This GAO report examines (1) the extent to which Medicaid enrollees have private insurance, and (2) the state and CMS initiatives to improve third-party liability (TPL). Given the findings in the report, GAO recommends that CMS routinely monitor and share information regarding key TPL efforts and challenges, as well as provide guidance on state oversight of TPL efforts conducted by Medicaid managed care plans.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides new but limited opportunities to promote or fund specialized transportation services for older people and adults with disabilities. This paper explains how states can use these largely untapped options to expand services for targeted low-income populations with mobility needs. It also presents two case studies illustrating how the Atlanta region and the state of Connecticut are making this work.

This final report shares results from the 2014 pilot of the National Core Indicators-Aging and Disabilities (NCI-AD) Consumer Survey in Georgia, Minnesota, and Ohio. The results are sorted by state and funding source within the state. Since the goal of the pilot was not to compare these states, but instead to test and refine the NCI-AD Consumer Survey, the three states are not identified in the report; they are simply referred to as State 1, State 2, and State 3.

This GAO report examines 1) the extent to which states have Supplemental Security Income/Disability Insurance (SSI/DI) advocacy contracts with private organizations; 2) how SSI/DI advocacy practices compare across selected sites; and 3) the key controls the Social Security Administration has to ensure these organizations follow SSI/DI program rules and regulations. The GAO identified 16 states with some type of SSI/DI advocacy contract in 2014.

As almost half of the States have implemented MLTSS programs, community-based organizations, will be significantly impacted. At the 2013 HCBS conference, ADvancing States, with support from the SCAN Foundation, held a day-long intensive to discuss these impacts. This report outlines 5 discrete roles that CBOs are well-suited to play in MLTSS programs using as a reference point CMS’ 2013 guidance on MLTSS program design and implementation. To request a hard copy version, email Ali Diaz at adiaz@advancingstates.org.

The Community First Choice (CFC) HCBS plan of California has been approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CFC is authorized under 1915(k) of the social security act, and is often called a 1915(k) state plan option. This file contains the approved SPA pages of the California State Plan.

The Community First Choice (CFC) HCBS plan of Montana has been approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CFC is authorized under 1915(k) of the social security act, and is often called a 1915(k) state plan option. This file contains the approval letter, summary form, and approved SPA pages of the Montana State Plan.

The Community First Choice (CFC) HCBS plan of Oregon has been approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CFC is authorized under 1915(k) of the social security act, and is often called a 1915(k) state plan option. This file contains the approved SPA pages of the Oregon State Plan.

The Community First Choice (CFC) HCBS plan of Maryland has been approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CFC is authorized under 1915(k) of the social security act, and is often called a 1915(k) state plan option. This file contains the approval letter, summary form, and approved SPA pages of the Maryland State Plan.

Community-based organizations will be notably impacted by States' implementation of MLTSS programs. Case studies on ombudsman programs and care/service coordination–culled from the MLTSS intensive at the 2013 HCBS Conference–complement the issue brief on CBO readiness. The ombudsman case studies highlight activities in Wisconsin, Hawaii, & Minnesota, while the care/service coordination case studies discuss CBO experiences in Massachusetts & Ohio. Both studies feature successful CBO practices.