Quality
Assurance and Quality Improvement in Home and Community Based Services
Grant
Information
Name of Grantee
Title of Grant
Type of Grant
Quality
Assurance and Quality Improvement in Home and Community Based Services
Amount of Grant
$499,880
Year Original Funding
Received
2003
Contact
Information
Jolene Kohn, Project Director
State Programs Administrator
Department of Human Services
651–297–3805
jolene.kohn@state.mn.us
Subcontractor(s)
Four to be awarded.
Target
Population(s)
Home and Community Based Services (HCBS)
waiver participants.
Goals
Activities
Abstract
This project will improve the design of participant
safeguards and the functions of discovery and remediation related to these
safeguards. It will also enhance the capacity of the HCBS waiver system by
improving the measurement of satisfaction and achievement of personal outcomes
for participants. This measurement data will be integrated with other division
and agency data into a comprehensive statewide QA/QI "data mart."
The Quality Design Commission is a consumer group created
to establish valued outcomes and recommend systems improvement strategies. By
gaining substantial consumer and stakeholder input through the Quality Design
Commission,
The Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) is the
lead agency for this grant. The Department's Continuing Care Administration
will be responsible for overseeing all aspects of project planning,
implementation, and evaluation and will partner with the DHS Disabilities
Services and Information Technology Strategies divisions, Quality Design
Commission, Minnesota Board on Aging, Minnesota Department of Health Office of
Health Facility Complaints, and eight county-based Adult Protection divisions,
to achieve the following outcomes: (1) improved response time between
discovery and remediation, (2) better identification of "poor"
providers, (3) discernment of patterns or trends in complaints and investigations
and targeted technical assistance, (4) consistent data to inform program
decisions that ensure higher quality, and (5) use of consumer-defined
measures of quality in both service delivery and service outcomes.
Formative evaluation methods will be designed and used to
assure the quality of program management, and will track the ongoing
effectiveness of project development and implementation. Summative evaluation
methods will be designed to document impact on consumers and evaluate the
entire project at the end of the grant period. Data for this evaluation will be
derived from monthly and quarterly project reports, financial records,
participant surveys, anecdotal information, and oral interviews with project
partners.